I think things that can hurt someone physically or mentally should not be protected by freedom of speech but most other words that are mean or make others feel better should be protected by the freedom of speech.
I type of speech that i think should be protected is threats, not all threats get reported, but then what the person says happens. I think all mean types of speeches should be tolerated, other nice type should be allowed.
The type of speeches that I think should be protected by the constitution is all of the different type of peoples conversations. I also think that anything that is not a threat should be protected. What I think should not be tolerated are threats. I think this because it could be true and if it is they need to take action. I also think other languages should not be tolerated or we should all have to learn and understand the language because they could be planning acts of violence without us knowing.
Speech that shouldn't be tolerated is anything that someone says that could put anybody else in danger. Also threatening shouldn't be tolerated because sometimes it can go to far. Even to the point where a life is lost.
I won't list the ones that should be protected under the first ammendment, rather I'll list things that should be unprotected by that ammendment(unprotected, or improtected?). nothing that would offend someone, nothing that would get someone hurt, and nothing that could put people's minds or bodies in danger. Yeah.......so yeah that's all I have to say. Tootles!
I think that the type of speech that shouldnt be tolerated is things that are threatening or could hurt people. Things like peacful protests are ok, as long as they dont get out of hand. Expressing your feelings is also fine.
I think any speech that is for the better is fine or not hurtful to others. I think any speech that could hurt someone is not tolerated. I think also if it is fine to the person being told to it is okay. This is so beacsuse it would not make the other person mad sad or angry. That is what I think.
I think some type of speech is not allowed.The type of speech i think that is not allowed is threats, threats should not be allowed because some people can take it very seriously and might freak out.I also think that the use of language of harassing is also a bad type of speech by swearing and '' foul mouth'' language because some younger children might hear it and start saying the terrible words.This is how i think that some types of language can be bad.
i think that you should say stuff but if you harm someone or yourself by threats then that will not be tolerated.
In my opinion the type of speech that should be protected is a NON-offending speech. Like something that has no consequence. So I actually don't think that the people walking out of the test should be protected by the freedom of speech law. Sooooo... thats what I have to say about that.
In my opinion, I think that anything than can harm or put anyone in danger should not be tolerated. It is not right to risk the lives of other people so anything that can do that shouldn't be tolerated. Anything other than that should be tolerated though.
I think that the type of speech that shouldn't be tolorated is the kind of speech that can hurt someone. That type of speech isn't good. The type that should be tolorated is the speech that is peaceful and doesn't hurt anyone.
In my opinion almost all of speech should be protected and allowd to be used but in some cases like lies should not be allowed. unless you are just going with a friend and call them a name but your just kidding around about it shouldnt be bad as long as they know your intenton was as a joke. But if you get angry and scream stuff like that and lie no i do not tink that should be protected.
I will start with the things that I think should not be protected by the freedom of speech law.One example is threats, for example saying that they would come to your house and steal your things. I have two different ways that I think should be tolerated by the law. My first one is something that is like walk in out on a test and saying that you are not going to do it. This is not a threat it is not doing anything to anyone other than yourself so I would say that is protected. One other one is that you telling someone that you are going to do something because again it is only telling yourself to do not someone else what to do.
I think it should be tolerated and recpected when people express their opinions and even have peaceful protests. Also, people should be able to write what they want, as long as it could not indirectly hurt someone (ex. How to makes bombs).I think it is not o.k. when threaten others and make false statements that could harm others.
i think that freedom of speech is important. But it also matters what you say so I think that hate should not be tolerated but people should be allowed to speAk their opinions about laws or regulation. With freedom of speech comes a lot of responsibility so I think that law makers should be more explicit with the law.
I think you can say anything you want but, It's the words you use it around. For an example... "Oh im gonan shoot the president" thats something you shouldn't say because then you are putting yourself in a situation that you probably can't get yourself out of. But if you say it like " I'm gonna shoot the president in the game" then I think you should able to say that since it is a game and it isn't towards anybody. So, my point was just use words that are exceptable and yea thats it.-KobeB24
The freedom of speech should only allow words that can't cause harm to someone but anything else is okay in my opinion
I think that if free speech was used to help people or to make apoint without hurting people thats ok. But if its mean like bulling then thats bad.
I think that as long as it doesn't hurt or threaten anyone you can say it.
Mr. Christopher A. Bunel6th Grade TeacherThompson Brook SchoolAvon, CT 06001